导 航
楼主: romano320

[江城资讯] 交通运输部:同意湖北省开展现代内河航运建设等交通强国建设试点工作

   关闭 [复制链接]
发表于 2020-7-6 04:49:18 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 04:53 编辑

"Suezmax" is a naval architecture term for the largest ship measurements capable of transiting the Suez Canal in a laden condition, and is almost exclusively used in reference to tankers. The limiting factors are beam, draft, height (because of the Suez Canal Bridge), and length[1] (even though the canal has no locks).

The current channel depth of the canal allows for a maximum of 20.1 metres (66 ft) of draft,[2] meaning that a few fully laden supertankers are too deep to fit through, and either have to unload part of their cargo to other ships ("transhipment") or to a pipeline terminal before passing through, or alternatively avoid the Suez Canal and travel around Cape Agulhas instead. The canal was deepened in 2009 from 18 to 20 metres (59 to 66 ft).

The typical deadweight of a Suezmax ship is about 160,000 tons and typically has a beam (width) of 50 m (164.0 ft). Also of note is the maximum head room—"air draft"—limitation of 68 m (223.1 ft), resulting from the 70 metres (230 ft) height above water of the Suez Canal Bridge. Suez Canal Authority produces tables of width and acceptable draft, which are subject to change.[1] From 2010, the wetted surface cross sectional area of the ship is limited by 1006 m2, which means 20.1 metres (66 ft) of draft for ships with the beam no wider than 50.0 m (164.0 ft) or 12.2 metres (40 ft) of draft for ships with maximum allowed beam of 77.5 metres (254 ft).[3]



Panamax and New Panamax (or Neopanamax) are terms for the size limits for ships travelling through the Panama Canal. The limits and requirements are published by the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) in a publication titled "Vessel Requirements".[1] These requirements also describe topics like exceptional dry seasonal limits, propulsion, communications, and detailed ship design.

The allowable size is limited by the width and length of the available lock chambers, by the depth of water in the canal, and by the height of the Bridge of the Americas since that bridge's construction. These dimensions give clear parameters for ships destined to traverse the Panama Canal and have influenced the design of cargo ships, naval vessels, and passenger ships.

Panamax specifications have been in effect since the opening of the canal in 1914. In 2009 the ACP published the New Panamax specification[2] which came into effect when the canal's third set of locks, larger than the original two, opened on 26 June 2016. Ships that do not fall within the Panamax-sizes are called post-Panamax or super-Panamax.

The increasing prevalence of vessels of the maximum size is a problem for the canal, as a Panamax ship is a tight fit that requires precise control of the vessel in the locks, possibly resulting in longer lock time, and requiring that these ships transit in daylight. Because the largest ships traveling in opposite directions cannot pass safely within the Culebra Cut, the canal effectively operates an alternating one-way system for these ships.

Panamax is determined principally by the dimensions of the canal's original lock chambers, each of which is 110 ft (33.53 m) wide, 1,050 ft (320.04 m) long, and 41.2 ft (12.56 m) deep. The usable length of each lock chamber is 1,000 ft (304.8 m). The available water depth in the lock chambers varies, but the shallowest depth is at the south sill of the Pedro Miguel Locks and is 41.2 ft (12.56 m) at a Miraflores Lake level of 54 ft 6 in (16.61 m). The clearance under the Bridge of the Americas at Balboa is the limiting factor on a vessel's overall height for both Panamax and Neopanamax ships; the exact figure depends on the water level.

The maximum dimensions allowed for a ship transiting the canal using the original locks and the new locks (New Panamax) are:[1]
Length

Overall (including protrusions): 950 ft (289.56 m). Exceptions:

    Container ship and passenger ship: 965 ft (294.13 m)
    Tug-barge combination, rigidly connected: 900 ft (274.32 m) overall
    Other non-self-propelled vessels-tug combination: 850 ft (259.08 m) overall;

New Panamax increases allowable length to 366 m (1,201 ft).[2]

Width (beam)

Width over outer surface of the shell plating: 106 ft (32.31 m). General exception: 107 ft (32.61 m), when draft is less than 37 ft (11.3 m) in tropical fresh water.

New Panamax increases allowable width to 49 m (161 ft).[2] Recently expanded to 51.25m

Draft

The maximum allowable draft is 39.5 ft (12.04 m) in Tropical Fresh Water (TFW). The name and definition of TFW is created by ACP using the freshwater Lake Gatún as a reference, since this is the determination of the maximum draft. The salinity and temperature of water affect its density, and hence how deep a ship will float in the water. Tropical Fresh Water (TFW) is fresh water of Lake Gatún, with density 0.9954 g/cm3, at 29.1 °C (84 °F).[3] The physical limit is set by the lower (seaside) entrance of the Pedro Miguel locks. When the water level in Lake Gatún is low during an exceptionally dry season the maximum permitted draft may be reduced. Such a restriction is published three weeks in advance, so ship loading plans can take appropriate measures.

New Panamax increases allowable draft to 15.2 m (49.9 ft),[2] however due to low rainfall, the canal authority limited draft to 43 feet when the new locks opened in June 2016, increasing it to 44 feet (13.41 meters), in August "based on the current level of Gatun Lake and the weather forecast for the following weeks."[4]

Height

Vessel height is limited to 190 ft (57.91 m) measured from the waterline to the vessel's highest point; the limit also pertains to New Panamax in order to pass under the Bridge of the Americas at Balboa harbor. Exception: 205 ft (62.5 m) when passage at low water (MLWS) at Balboa is possible.[citation needed]

All exceptions are typically allowed only after specific request and an investigation, and on a once- or twice-only basis.[citation needed]

Cargo capacity

A Panamax cargo ship would typically have a DWT of 65,000–80,000 tonnes, but its maximum cargo would be about 52,500 tonnes during a transit due to draft limitations in the canal.[5] New Panamax ships can carry 120,000 DWT.[6] Panamax container ships can carry 5,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU); with 13,000 TEU for New Panamax vessels.



Malaccamax is a naval architecture term for the largest tonnage of ship capable of fitting through the 25-metre-deep (82 ft) Strait of Malacca. Bulk carriers and supertankers have been built to this tonnage, and the term is chosen for very large crude carriers (VLCC). They can transport oil from Arabia to China.[1] A typical Malaccamax tanker can have a maximum length of 333 m (1,093 ft), beam of 60 m (197 ft), draught of 20.5 m (67.3 ft), and tonnage of 300,000 DWT.[2]



The term Seawaymax refers to vessels which are the maximum size that can fit through the canal locks of the St. Lawrence Seaway, linking the inland Great Lakes of North America with the Atlantic Ocean.[1]Seawaymax vessels are 740 feet (225.6 m) in length, 78 feet (23.8 m) wide, and have a draft of 26.51 feet (8.08 m) and a height above the waterline of 35.5 metres (116 ft).[1] A number of lake freighters larger than this size cruise the Great Lakes and cannot pass through to the Atlantic Ocean. The size of the locks limits the size of the ships which can pass and so limits the size of the cargoes they can carry. The record tonnage for one vessel on the Seaway is 28,502 tons of iron ore while the record through the larger locks of the Great Lakes Waterway is 72,351 tons. Most new lake vessels, however, are constructed to the Seawaymax limit to enhance versatility by allowing the possibility of off-Lakes use. SS Edmund Fitzgerald, famous for her wreck in 1975, was the first ship constructed close to Seawaymax size.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 04:54:47 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 05:03 编辑
gaoloumi2035 发表于 2020-7-6 04:49
"Suezmax" is a naval architecture term for the largest ship measurements capable of transiting the S ...


巴型船五千标箱五万吨是最普及的,这是有一定的原因的,可以过巴拿马老船道,过路费价格便宜,还可以过苏伊士运河,到美东和欧洲都抄近路。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 05:27:10 | 显示全部楼层
gaoloumi2035 发表于 2020-7-6 04:49
"Suezmax" is a naval architecture term for the largest ship measurements capable of transiting the S ...

长江挖倒8m估计seawaymax就能通行了,那时候才算真正的东方芝加哥哈。。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 06:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 07:26 编辑
lmlaaron 发表于 2020-7-6 05:27
长江挖倒8m估计seawaymax就能通行了,那时候才算真正的东方芝加哥哈。。


SEAWAYMAX不够大,阻挡了芝加哥的发展。武汉应该到超级巴拿马,300米X50米X25米X12.5米,10,000 TEU,100,000吨。甚至马六甲浅水型:360米X60米X30米X15米,20,000 TEU,200,000吨。扬州船厂可以出厂400米X60米的船,一旦尹公洲修好,马六甲浅水型到达南京的可能性很大,到武汉就是航道水深的问题了。


--------------------------------
中新网江苏新闻3月26日电(扬海轩 谢圣飞)26日,扬州中远海运重工建造的40万吨矿砂船在3艘海巡艇维护和8条拖轮协助下安全顺利出坞。

所在船坞位于夹江大桥南侧,三江营河口北侧,水域通航情况较为复杂,且船长达到362米,出坞靠泊作业难度大、要求高。为保障作业安全,扬州海事提前介入,拟定了全面细致的维护方案。

3月25日,海事执法人员赶至船坞现场,对作业设备、安全与防污染设备、应急设备以及作业方案等进行检查,并重点检查坞底的焊渣、油污、铁锈,要求船方更加熟悉出坞方案、防污染设备操作方法和应急预案,落实企业主体责任,船上垃圾、污水严禁排放入江。

3月26日上午9时许,扬州海事3艘海巡艇提前到达指定水域,对进三江营河口的船只、船队进行控制疏导,通过甚高频发布航行警告,提醒船舶控制船速,与作业船舶保持安全距离。在夹江大桥上游,对即将进入桥区引航浮的船只进行疏导,为船舶出坞和靠泊提供足够的安全范围。经过1个多小时的紧张作业,最终该轮安全出坞。海事部门随后综合协调过往船舶,督促统一会让行动,直至恢复正常通航秩序。

据悉,此次出坞船舶船体号为H1443,船长362米,宽65米,型深30.4米,载重吨为40万吨,目前安全靠泊于扬州中远海运重工舾装码头,完成舾装工作后将出江试航。(完)

--------------------------------
许崇标介绍,二期工程试运行一年期间,长江引航中心引领船舶载运沿江企业生产的各类“中国制造”出口500余艘次,比如成功引领装载167米高钻井平台出口的半潜船“振华15”轮以及新造船长400米、2万标箱级集装箱船舶“中远川崎233”号安全出江,助力江苏扬子江船业集团公司承建的“香港号”等40万吨级系列散货船交付出江,引领南京金陵船厂建造的世界最大长度滚装船丹麦籍“歌迪亚海路”轮首航出江。

--------------------------------
2011年6月7日中午12时40分,一艘巴拿马籍外轮“好景”号缓缓靠泊镇江码头。据了解,这艘船是镇江港建港以来靠泊的最大一艘外轮,比今年2月份靠泊的马耳他籍“金牛座”轮还要长3米。据了解,该轮船长246米,宽42米,吃水深13.3米,载重吨位达9.44万吨。从宁波北仑港装载3.4万吨铁矿砂来镇江港卸货,该轮甲板面积比一个标准足球场还大。

----------------------------------
昨天(11月26日)下午2点45分,随着"达飞波特兰轮"缓缓靠泊上港正和码头泊位,苏州太仓港迎来了开港以来历史上最大集装箱船,该轮经过5台桥吊机历时15个小时的紧张吊装,在装载了2636只标准集装箱后,于今天上午8点半驶离太仓港,前往南美洲的厄瓜多尔瓜亚基尔港,该船也是目前长江里营运的最大吨级的集装箱船。

早上7点半,靠泊在上港正和码头的"达飞波特兰轮""整装待发",太仓引航站高级引航员孙北京等两人登上货轮,将船引航到上海宝山后,再交付给其他引航基地引航出海。

从昨天下午大船靠泊码头开始,上港正和码头有限公司迅速行动起来,将6台桥吊机中的5台调集出来,全力保障装载及时高效,终于在今天早上6点15分将最后一个集装箱吊装上船。承接这次理货的太仓中理外轮理货有限公司也调集了精兵强将,努力保障理货服务到位。

"达飞波特兰轮"集装箱轮船籍为利比里亚,是2003年建造的, 船长286.26米、船宽32.2米、吃水9.5米,总吨位51364 ,净吨位27298,最大载重吨58255,型深21.8米,水面以上高度56.15米,可满载4444只标准集装箱。

这次"达飞波特兰轮"的到来,刷新了太仓港最大集装箱轮的纪录,也是目前长江航道营运的最大吨级的集装箱船。船长比2017年9月30日来港的"达飞蒂姆轮"长60米,多1000只标箱,载重大7000吨。是第一条从太仓港上港正和码头始发的外贸远洋大船,也意味着上港正和码头作业能力迈入"大船时代"。
-------------------------------------
5月2日18:30,中国籍油船“广兴洲”轮在长江引航中心南京引航站吕天刚、彭建斌等4名引航员的精心引领下,稳稳地靠泊南京港612码头,打破南京港接靠油船中最大长度、最大载重吨两项历史纪录。

据悉,“广兴洲”轮隶属于招商局南京油运股份有限公司,船长228.6米,吃水10.8米,载重吨74066,本航次载运4.26万吨原油。该轮常年在国际航线和中国沿海航行,本航次是首次抵靠内河南京港。

由于该轮尺度大,又是首次靠泊南京港,接到此次引航申请后,南京引航站高度重视,详细制订引航方案和应急预案,选派经验丰富的引航员带队执行引航任务。

航行过程中,引航员与船方密切沟通,加强团队协作,全程备锚瞭头航行,克服尹公洲航段通航环境复杂、重载船舶操纵困难等因素,谨慎操作,以策安全。同时,站领导赴码头现场协调,调度人员加强AIS船位监控,提前落实拖轮协靠、海巡艇警戒等安全措施,确保海轮顺利靠泊。

据统计,2019年1-4月,南京引航站共引领吃水超11米海船119艘次,船长超225米海船81艘次,充分挖掘长江黄金水道潜能,提升南京港口综合竞争力,努力为“长江经济带”建设贡献引航力量。 
----------------------------------------
人民网南京9月3日电 (耿志超)3日上午11时,首艘船长189.99米、总吨32879吨、吃水深度达11.36米的巨无霸“利电5”轮安全靠泊在了南京龙潭港区明州码头。据南京海事局相关负责人透露,“利电5”轮超越了前期靠泊龙潭港的“凯兰美洲”轮,再次刷新了南京港靠泊海船的最大吃水记录,是有史以来南京港靠泊的最大船舶,标志着南京港正在逐步迈入通航能力5万吨级及以上的崭新的时代。

据介绍,自今年7月5日长江南京以下12.5m深水航道开通以来,长江南京段的船舶通航能力得到显著提升,但随着大型“巨无霸”的进江,长江水上通航安全也经受着巨大的考验,南京海事局相关负责人在接受记者采访时表示,深水航道的开通为大型船进江提供了便利,但目前仍处于开通初期,通航条件还存在诸多限制,大型海船的进江也增加了长江的通航压力,为此海事部门自深水航道开通之初便制定了方案全力保障通航安全。

“利电5”轮进港靠泊期间,南京海事局船舶交通管理中心对其进行了重点跟踪监控,运用技术手段为其提供航行指导,同时派遣海巡艇现场对其周边水域进行船流疏导,为其进出港口提供有利条件,成功确保其航行不受通航环境限制,安全靠泊明州码头。
----------------------------------------
5月4日11:00时,英国籍“史丹纳想象”轮在长江引航中心南京引航站顾卫军、彭建斌两名一级引航员的精心引领下,稳稳地靠泊南京港清江码头,刷新南京港接靠最大吃水化工品船的历史纪录。
“史丹纳想象”轮,船长183.2米,吃水11.25米,船型5万吨级,本航次从美国进口3.75万吨货物,为南京引航站引领的历史最大吃水化工品船。接到此次引航申请后,南京引航站高度重视,制定了详细的引航方案,选派有丰富超大型海轮操作经验的一级引航员引领。
航行过程中,两名引航员克服嘶马湾和尹公洲航段操纵难度大、涨水时渔网碍航、重载操纵性能差、海轮受风面积大等困难,密切配合,谨慎操作,加强瞭望,日夜兼程。同时,引航调度人员加强GPS船位监控,提前落实协靠拖轮等安全措施,确保海轮按照既定计划顺利靠泊。
该轮的安全引领,标志着长江南京以下12.5米深水航道二期工程交工验收后,吃水超11米的海轮靠离南京港将进入常态化,此举大大降低了航运物流成本,提升了港口运营效率,增强了南京港综合竞争力。同时,南京引航站发挥引航技术优势,充分挖掘航道水深潜能,保持服务能力与12.5米水深向上延伸同步。
据统计,自2018年4月1日以来,南京引航站共引领吃水超11米海轮17艘次,创造了良好的经济效益和社会效益。
----------------------------------------
为更好地适应船舶大型化发展需要,满足多家客户拼装需求,有效降低客户综合物流成本,近日,在口岸查验部门的大力支持下,我港成功装运近年来最大的化肥出口船舶。该船载重吨为69128吨,船长225米,吃水10.8米,实际装载出口化肥50218吨。目前该船货物已由四公司和天宇公司共同装卸完成。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 06:48:05 | 显示全部楼层
内河航运的复兴就是武汉重新崛起的标志!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 07:01:38 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 07:12 编辑

8米航道船型其实是小型巴船,192米长,32米宽,16米深,8米吃水,可以装3000标箱,载重40000吨,夏季吃水9米可以到5万吨。这个看看5-10年内能不能通行。一旦通行,武汉港就是中西部到亚洲的绝对出海口,新疆一直到西安成都都会到武汉铁水联运,直达日韩港台东南亚,甚至澳新,价格比中西部铁路到洋山港北仑港肯定要便宜,比中西部铁路到武汉港再到洋山港北仑港肯定要时间少。而且国内沿海内贸也会直达武汉港,然后铁水联运到中西部,不需要中转港。8米航道船型也可以跑美东纽约和欧洲,不一定比大船贵。跑美西,非洲和中东肯定不如大船。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 07:51:02 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 07:54 编辑

国际船舶运输协会最新的研究表明,海船不是越大越好。以后的趋势是灵活机动可以适应多种航线各种港口复杂航道的中型船,5000-10,000TEU是最好的。武汉9-12.5米航道时候就可以达到了,所谓后发优势。

Container ships are the work-horses of the globalized economy: although they represent only one
eighth of the total world fleet they are essential for the transport of consumer goods around the world.
Container ships have grown bigger at a rapid pace over the last decades, faster than any other ship type.
In one decade, the average capacity of a container ship has doubled. The largest container ship at this
moment can carry 19,200 containers 1 , but ships with capacity of more than 21,000 containers have been
ordered and will be operational in 2017.
Larger container ships have generated cost savings for carriers, decreased maritime transport costs
and as such facilitated global trade in the past. However, larger ships require adaptations of
infrastructure, equipment and cause larger peaks in container traffic in ports, with wide-ranging impacts.
This report assesses if the benefits of the current mega container ships still outweigh their costs to the
whole transport chain.
This report is part of the OECD/ITF Mega-Ship project. Other publications that will be released
within the framework of this project include case studies of Hamburg, Gothenburg and Jakarta.

Executive summary





Cost savings from bigger container ships are decreasing
The transport costs due to larger ships could be substantial
Supply chain risks related to mega-container ships are rising
Public policies need to better take account of this and act accordingly
Further increase of maximum container ship size would raise transport costs
There are cost savings of mega-ships, but these are decreasing and might not even be realized.
Doubling the maximum container ship size over the last decade has reduced total vessel costs per
transported container by roughly a third. However, these cost savings are decreasing with size; the cost
savings of the newest generation of containerships are four to six times smaller than the savings from the
previous round of upsizing. Approximately 60% of the cost savings of the most recent container ships are
related to more efficient engines and not to scale. In addition, mega-ship development and the related
container fleet capacity growth has taken place despite sluggish growth of world containerized seaborne
trade. The massive ordering of new mega-ships has resulted in oversupply of container ships, which will
most likely dampen some of the cost savings due to larger ships, as low demand results in fewer savings
per transported container.
The transport costs due to larger ships could be substantial. There are size-related fixes to
existing infrastructure, such as bridge height, river width/depth, quay wall strengthening, berth
deepening, canals/locks and port equipment (crane height, outreach). Mega-ships also require expansion
of infrastructure to cater to the higher peaks related to mega-ships; as a result, more physical yard and
berth capacity is needed. These annualised transport costs related to mega-ships could amount to US$ 0.4
billion, according to our rough and tentative estimations. Roughly a third of the additional costs might be
related to equipment, a third to dredging and another third to port infrastructure and port hinterland costs.
A substantial share of the dredging, infrastructure and hinterland connection costs are costs to the public
sector in many countries.
Supply chain risks related to bigger container ships are rising. There are concerns about
insurability of mega-ships and the costs of potential salvage in case of accidents. Mega-ships also lead to
service and cargo concentration, reduced choice and more limited supply chain resilience, especially
since bigger ships have coincided with increased cooperation of the main shipping lines in four alliances.
In addition,
Public policies need to better take account of this and act accordingly. Key question is how the
costs for the public sector imposed by mega-ships could be covered. Many ports and countries have,
either accidentally or on purpose, encouraged the development of mega-ships. More balanced decision-
making would be needed, with clearer alignment of incentives to public interests, policy support to
enhance supply chain productivity, more regional collaboration and the creation of an appropriate forum
for a discussion between liner companies and all other relevant transport actors.
Further increase of maximum container ship size would raise transport costs. So one could
wonder if such increases would be desirable. The potential cost savings to carriers appear to be fairly
marginal, but infrastructure upsizing costs could be phenomenal. Introduction of one hundred 24,000
TEU ships in 2020 would require substantial investments in those places where these ships would be first
introduced (Far East, North Europe, Mediterranean), but would also - via cascading effects - result in
introduction of 19,000 TEU ships in North America and 14,000 TEU ships in South America and Africa.
This would imply additional investment requirements there as well.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2020-7-6 08:30:02 | 显示全部楼层

适时开辟武汉—韩国江海直航
武汉大力推进航运中心“新通道”建设



据武汉长江航运中心“新通道”建设研讨会上消息,在稳步运行武汉—日本集装箱江海直航的基础上,武汉将开辟至韩国江海直航航线,推进实现国际中转联运,畅通汉江流域,实现内河航运高质量发展、打造成为服务于长江中游以及中西部地区的公共水运平台和公共运输通道。


新港委相关负责人介绍,自去年11月28日试运行至今年6月25日,武汉至日本集装箱江海直航航线共开行12个航次。下一步将在适当时候开辟武汉至韩国直航航线。同时,武汉正加快推进实现国际中转联运,将武汉—日本集装箱江海直航航线,通过铁水联运,与中欧班列(武汉)对接,实现“海—江—铁”联运,形成物流闭环,构建联通日本—武汉—中东、中亚及欧洲地区的国际铁水联运大通道,“相较传统的日本至欧洲海运路线可节省约10~20天”


专家建议,在现有2艘560标箱汉亚集装箱船的基础上,继续新增投入运力,再增加3艘集装箱船投入武汉至日本直达航线的运输,一方面保障现有航线的正常运营,另一方面可以增加航点和班期密度。设计建造武汉至韩国的集装箱示范船。同时,在武汉至上海江海直达的1140船型的基础上,设计建造2000标箱集装箱船,推进黄金水道大船时代,真正发挥长江黄金水道优势。


汉江流域腹地拥有大量化肥、饲料加工、建材加工和轻纺加工等企业,随着市场的扩展,汉江沿线企业逐步增强生产能力,扩大外销市场份额,汉江流域港口,作为武汉航运中心喂给港越来越迸发生命力。专家提出,加快汉江流域航道的升级建设,将汉江兴隆船闸至蔡甸约200公里水路疏浚,航道从现有1.8米水深扩深至3米水深,以此满足3000吨级集装箱船舶的全天候通行
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 08:47:58 | 显示全部楼层

这个船好像是汉海1号??今天的新闻。 可是为什么开到阳逻港上游来了?难道跑岳阳,宜昌?能过三峡吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 09:37:31 | 显示全部楼层
哈哈,我发现我高估了宜昌翻坝铁路,理由如下
重庆运货出来如果先走水路,再上茅坪港装上火车,确实不如铁路直接运出来。(茅坪港可以作为省内分发站,就是船上货物上岸后,就直接汽车运输到省内以及临省目的地,这个市场还是蛮大的,宜昌茅坪港的地位不变,就是翻坝铁路没有我想象中的重要)
重庆四川海外进口贸易,如果水运到武汉,再上火车,也不需要再过三峡大坝+翻坝铁路

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 09:41:27 | 显示全部楼层
https://tieba.baidu.com/p/6521267583

有个帖子供参考
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 09:45:06 | 显示全部楼层
lmlaaron 发表于 2020-7-6 08:47
这个船好像是汉海1号??今天的新闻。 可是为什么开到阳逻港上游来了?难道跑岳阳,宜昌?能过三峡吗?

会不会是到经开区的码头装货?不过经开区的集装箱码头好像是5000吨级别的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 09:47:27 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 10:34 编辑
元始天尊 发表于 2020-7-6 09:37
哈哈,我发现我高估了宜昌翻坝铁路,理由如下
重庆运货出来如果先走水路,再上茅坪港装上火车,确实不如铁 ...


清朝就是这样的,四川重庆靠汉口港中转。还有湖南,湖北,江西,河南,陕西(宁夏,甘肃,新疆),山西,贵州,云南。
清朝是中国自然经济的顶峰,没有太多的人工干预,所以武汉的地理位置是天选的。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 10:36:54 | 显示全部楼层
gaoloumi2035 发表于 2020-7-6 09:45
会不会是到经开区的码头装货?不过经开区的集装箱码头好像是5000吨级别的。

不管去哪个码头,看来是能过号称净空18米的大桥而且是洪水期过?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2020-7-6 10:37:55 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 gaoloumi2035 于 2020-7-6 10:47 编辑


不错。长江沿海化的说法是对的。航道还要快速挖深,看看能不能10年后,中下游统一到12.5米。这样武汉港就可以通万箱超巴船了,规模效益不亚于最大的2万箱船。洋山港和北仑港的远洋航运垄断意义会减弱很多。近洋支线武汉港以后完全可以替代洋山港和北仑港。

这个可比高铁武青武贵武福重要太多。也比天河T3T4T5重要,更比一些城建重要,以上这些方面武汉基础可以了,长江能沿海化可是质的突破。如果要和国家发改委讨价还价,这个应该最优先,可以砍掉一些次优先的项目换取这个早日实现。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|

GMT+8, 2024-6-11 11:07 , Processed in 0.084702 second(s), 2 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表